Skip to content

Agents where your team already works.

Runlev can place governed assistance in the communications, records, and application interfaces around the work—then make the transition from input to proposed action clear enough to inspect.

Three places an agent can help move the work forward.

The channel, background process, and application interface each play a different role. The right connection depends on the workflow, the records involved, and where review belongs.

Channel agents

Bring a defined messaging, email, or document intake into the operating path without asking the team to abandon the channels it already uses.

A message or document can be read in context, connected to the relevant work, and held with its source before anyone decides what happens next.

Messaging · email · documents

Background agents

Interpret incoming information, categorize it, match the relevant records, and prepare a proposed workflow action in the background.

The purpose is not to hide the work. It is to reduce reconstruction while preserving the source, current state, and review point an operator needs.

Interpret · categorize · match

In-app agents

Place chat and contextual assistance inside a web or desktop application, where the useful record and next decision are already in view.

The interface can provide grounded help, surface missing context, and prepare an action while leaving the accountable decision with the person using the system.

Web applications · desktop applications

From communication to operation.

A connected agent can follow one explicit sequence from an incoming source to a reviewable operating action. Each stage has a visible job, rather than turning the handoff into an opaque automation.

  1. Receive
  2. Interpret
  3. Categorize
  4. Match
  5. Propose
  6. Review
  7. Commit
Receive → Interpret → Categorize → Match → Propose → Review → Commit. Review is the intentional checkpoint before a consequential action becomes part of the operating record.

Review and control.

Consequential actions can require human review. The system can make its source context, match, and proposed next step visible before a person approves, changes, or declines it.

Synthetic and illustrative boundary

This demonstration never sends communications or commits records.

  • No send
  • No commit
  • Human review remains visible

See a synthetic workflow in motion.

Explore the Operations Lab for illustrative operating paths, or get in touch when a real workflow needs a governed connection.